Reading Flannery O’Connor with Buddah Eyes

Academic Publication  ·  Literary Criticism

Reading Flannery O’Connor
with Buddha Eyes

← Back to Writing
Peer-Reviewed Article Vol. 10 (2011)  ·  pp. 54–63

Publication

Eureka Studies in Teaching Short Fiction

Vol. 10 (2011), pp. 54–63  ·  ISSN 1533-8509

Eureka College, Eureka, Illinois


About the Essay

Flannery O’Connor is one of the most theologically ferocious writers in American literature. Her stories are full of liars, misfits, self-righteous women, and hollow men — and in nearly every one of them, grace arrives not as a quiet blessing but as a collision. A violent act. A sudden humiliation. An unwanted intrusion of the divine into a life that had carefully arranged itself to keep God out. O’Connor wrote from deep inside a Catholic sensibility, and yet in this essay Donna Gessell asks a quietly radical question: what happens when we bring Buddhist eyes to that vision of grace?

The answer, it turns out, reveals something neither tradition could say quite so clearly on its own.

The Problem of Seeing

O’Connor believed that her readers were spiritually blind — numbed by materialism, self-satisfaction, and the comfortable assumption that they understood the world well enough. Her grotesque characters and eruptive plots were not exercises in shock for their own sake. They were corrective lenses. She wrote that for the hard of hearing, you shout; for the nearly blind, you draw large and startling figures. Grace, in O’Connor’s fiction, is the moment the startling figure finally forces the eye open.

Buddhist thought begins in a remarkably similar place. The foundational diagnosis of the human condition in Buddhism is avidyā — ignorance, or more precisely, a fundamental misperception of reality. We see ourselves as separate, permanent, and central. We do not see clearly. The cultivation of prajnā, or wisdom, is the long work of learning to see what is actually there: the impermanence of things, the interconnectedness of all beings, the illusion of the defended self.

“The nature of grace can be made plain only by describing its absence.”

— Flannery O’Connor, Mystery and Manners

Gessell’s essay finds that the Buddha’s “awakened eyes” and O’Connor’s theology of grace are, at their root, doing the same work: breaking through the ordinary defenses of the ego to allow a person to see — really see — what they have been refusing to look at. The vocabulary is different. The cosmology is different. But the dynamic of blindness, crisis, and sudden seeing is shared.

Grace as Rupture

In story after story, O’Connor’s characters are self-enclosed. The grandmother in A Good Man Is Hard to Find is a monument to propriety and self-regard. Hulga in Good Country People has built an entire identity around her nihilism and her doctoral degree. Mrs. Turpin in Revelation quietly ranks all of humanity and places herself near the top. What these characters share is an armored version of the self — what Buddhism would recognize as a particularly entrenched attachment to ego and fixed identity.

The crisis O’Connor visits upon them is not punishment. It is, in her theological framing, mercy. The Misfit’s gun does not damn the grandmother — it finally cracks her open. In that crack, something moves. O’Connor is careful never to promise that her characters accept what moves through them. But the moment of rupture is the moment grace becomes possible.

East & West in Donna’s Classroom

This essay grew from decades of teaching O’Connor’s short fiction alongside Donna’s work in peace studies and cross-cultural humanities. Her course “Visions of Peace in East and West” brought Buddhist, Christian, and other wisdom traditions into sustained conversation — making her uniquely positioned to read O’Connor’s Catholic grace through a Buddhist lens.

Constructing Grace: A Pedagogical Frame

The essay appears in Eureka Studies in Teaching Short Fiction, a journal devoted to the practice of teaching literature in the classroom — and that context shapes its ambitions. Gessell is not merely arguing a critical thesis. She is asking how teachers can help students encounter O’Connor’s grace when students come from traditions that have no category for it, or from no religious tradition at all.

The Buddhist framework offers a bridge. Students who find O’Connor’s Catholic theology alien or off-putting can approach the same transformation through the vocabulary of awakening, compassion, and the dissolution of ego-attachment. The grace does not need to be named as grace. What matters is recognizing the moment — in literature as in life — when the hard shell around a person cracks and something truer becomes possible.

In this way, the essay performs what it argues. It constructs a bridge between two ways of knowing — not to collapse their differences, but to let each illuminate what the other makes harder to see.


Full Citation

Gessell, Donna A. “Reading Flannery O’Connor with Buddha Eyes: Constructing Grace.” Eureka Studies in Teaching Short Fiction, Vol. 10 (2011), pp. 54–63. ISSN 1533-8509. Eureka College, Eureka, Illinois.

Available through academic library databases including ERIC and LearnTechLib. Contact your institution’s library for access.


DG

Donna A. Gessell, Ph.D.

Professor Emerita of English, University of North Georgia. Doctorate in English Literature from Case Western Reserve University. Peace Corps Volunteer in Fiji, 1979–1982. Former Director of Graduate Studies at UNG, where she taught Milton, linguistics, the rhetoric of the Bible, and the literature of peace for more than three decades.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top